News
Public · Published
U.S. 2-Year Treasury Auction Shows Slightly Softer Demand
The U.S. Treasury sold $69 billion in 2-year notes at a high yield of 4.708%, slightly above the 4.705% when-issued yield. Demand looked softer: the bid-to-cover ratio, which compares bids received with the amount sold, fell to 2.59 from 2.63, and indirect bidders took 45.7% versus about 57.7% previously.
Published:
Updated:
What happened
The U.S. Treasury sold $69 billion in 2-year notes at a high yield of 4.708%, slightly above the 4.705% when-issued yield. Demand looked softer: the bid-to-cover ratio, which compares bids received with the amount sold, fell to 2.59 from 2.63, and indirect bidders took 45.7% versus about 57.7% previously.
Confirmed
Global impact / market context
The two-year yield closely tracks what investors expect from Federal Reserve interest-rate policy. Softer demand, shown by weaker bidding and fewer indirect bidders, which include foreign buyers, suggests investors demanded a slightly higher yield to hold the notes. Higher government borrowing costs can feed into other loan rates.
Analyst inference
The auction came before the Federal Reserve's rate decision on Wednesday, when the Federal Open Market Committee is largely expected to hold interest rates steady. After the auction, the 2-year Treasury yield rose to 4.712% from 4.707% beforehand, suggesting investors wanted a bit more compensation to hold this debt.
Analyst inference
What to watch
- Watch Wednesday's Federal Reserve decision, when the Federal Open Market Committee is largely expected to hold interest rates steady, because the outcome can change what investors expect for future policy. Confirmed
- Watch the 2-year Treasury yield, now 4.712%, as a signal of investor expectations for Fed policy; a further rise would suggest markets expect rates to stay higher for longer. Analyst inference
- Watch future Treasury auctions for the bid-to-cover ratio and the share taken by indirect bidders, which fell to 45.7%, to see whether weaker demand persists and raises the government's borrowing costs. Proposed
Evidence
- Original source link unavailable