News
Public · Published
Nasdaq hits near three-month low as Amazon, Intel rattle AI trade
The Nasdaq fell to a near three-month low after Amazon's aggressive spending plans on artificial intelligence and Intel's cash-burn warning raised concerns about AI buildout costs and the timeline for returns. Amazon fell 2%, Intel was set for a record one-day drop near 29%, and chip stocks sold off.
Published:
Updated:
What happened
The Nasdaq fell to a near three-month low after Amazon's aggressive spending plans on artificial intelligence and Intel's cash-burn warning raised concerns about AI buildout costs and the timeline for returns. Amazon fell 2%, Intel was set for a record one-day drop near 29%, and chip stocks sold off.
Confirmed
Global impact / market context
Heavy spending on artificial intelligence is squeezing cash available at Amazon, while Intel's own cash burn shows the cost of expanding production. When investors doubt the payback timeline, they sell chip and server stocks, pulling money away from companies tied to the AI buildout.
Analyst inference
The selloff spread across global chip and server makers: Nvidia fell 3.7%, AMD about 10%, the chips index 7%, and Dell and HP lost 10.4% and 8.7%. Amazon and Intel were set to erase near $200 billion in combined market value, with the Nasdaq-100 set to lose over $1 trillion.
Analyst inference
What to watch
- Amazon reported a sharp cash outflow in the third quarter and signaled another increase in capital expenditure, which means spending on long-term assets, next year, so watch whether spending rises while cash available keeps shrinking. Confirmed
- Watch for further AI spending plans from large technology companies and whether those plans come with clearer timelines for returns, which could calm selling in chip and server stocks. Proposed
- Intel said it would burn cash this year because of a weak PC market, manufacturing hurdles and heavy production spending. Watch whether those pressures ease, since a continued cash drain could keep chip stocks under pressure. Analyst inference
Evidence
- Original source link unavailable