News

Public · Published

Unisys Corporation reports results for the quarter ended September 30 - Earnings Summary

Unisys reported an adjusted loss of 12 cents per share for the quarter ended September 30, compared with a loss per share a year earlier and analysts' expected loss of 23 cents. Revenue rose 2.5% to $471.50 million, above the $449.85 million analysts expected; the company also reported a $201 million quarterly loss.

Published:

Updated:

What happened

Unisys reported an adjusted loss of 12 cents per share for the quarter ended September 30, compared with a loss per share a year earlier and analysts’ expected loss of 23 cents. Revenue rose 2.5% to $471.50 million, above the $449.85 million analysts expected; the company also reported a $201 million quarterly loss.

Confirmed

Global impact / market context

Revenue growth and a smaller adjusted loss than analysts expected suggest the quarter’s sales and underlying performance were stronger than forecast. However, the reported $201 million loss and adjusted loss per share show Unisys remained unprofitable, which may constrain cash available for operations or investment if losses persist.

Analyst inference

Analysts’ average rating was “buy,” with three buy or strong-buy recommendations and one hold; the group average was also “buy.” The median 12-month price target was $5.00, around 53% above the last close, while shares were down 14.5% year to date.

Confirmed

What to watch

  1. Watch whether revenue growth continues in later quarters; sustained sales gains could support operating income, while a slowdown would weaken the evidence that demand is improving. Analyst inference
  2. Track adjusted loss per share and the reported net loss together, since adjusted figures exclude some items and may not show the full cost of remaining unprofitable. Analyst inference
  3. The article reports no analyst estimate revisions in the last 30 days; future estimate changes could indicate whether analysts revise earnings expectations after these results. Confirmed

Evidence

  • Original source link unavailable