News
Public · Published
Samsung's Exynos 2700 outperforms Qualcomm's flagship chip by nearly 20 pc
Samsung Electronics' Exynos 2700 mobile processor scored nearly 20 percent higher than Qualcomm's flagship Snapdragon chip in an internal multicore CPU test, according to The Korea Herald. In Geekbench 6.5 multicore tests, the Exynos 2700 scored approximately 13,000 versus around 11,000 for Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6.
Published:
Updated:
What happened
Samsung Electronics' Exynos 2700 mobile processor scored nearly 20 percent higher than Qualcomm's flagship Snapdragon chip in an internal multicore CPU test, according to The Korea Herald. In Geekbench 6.5 multicore tests, the Exynos 2700 scored approximately 13,000 versus around 11,000 for Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6.
Confirmed
Global impact / market context
A faster Samsung chip could win more design slots in Galaxy S27 phones, shifting processor orders and money toward Samsung's chip unit and away from Qualcomm, which earns revenue selling chips to phone makers. This could pressure Qualcomm's sales and profit.
Analyst inference
The reported result is an internal test, not an independent review, so buyers and investors may wait for outside confirmations. Qualcomm's position as a supplier to premium Android phones is central to its revenue, making any credible rival benchmark relevant to how investors value it.
Analyst inference
What to watch
- Samsung is expected to debut the Exynos 2700 in the Galaxy S27 series, per the report. Watch whether that launch happens and whether the chip appears in high-volume models. Confirmed
- Track independent benchmark tests from outside reviewers to confirm the roughly 20 percent multicore gap, since the reported figures come from Samsung's own internal testing rather than neutral labs. Proposed
- Watch Qualcomm's next chip releases and phone-maker orders, especially Xiaomi, as signs of whether premium Android customers stay with Snapdragon or shift share toward Samsung's Exynos. Analyst inference
Evidence
- Original source link unavailable