News
Public · Published
Who Gets the 750,000 New AI Jobs? Mark Cuban Has a Warning
Employers have cited artificial intelligence in more than twice as many US job cuts this year as in all of 2025. Billionaire investor Mark Cuban argues workers are watching the wrong threat, shifting focus from the technology to the people using it. New hiring data and a Gallup survey suggest this shift matters for who gets hired and who gets laid off.
Published:
Updated:
What happened
Employers have cited artificial intelligence in more than twice as many US job cuts this year as in all of 2025. Billionaire investor Mark Cuban argues workers are watching the wrong threat, shifting focus from the technology to the people using it. New hiring data and a Gallup survey suggest this shift matters for who gets hired and who gets laid off.
Confirmed
Global impact / market context
If companies blame artificial intelligence for job cuts, workers and investors may misread the real cause of shrinking payrolls. Cuban's point suggests managers and cost decisions, not the technology alone, drive those cuts, which affects which skills stay in demand and which employees face replacement.
Analyst inference
Hiring data and a Gallup survey accompany this debate, so investors can watch whether job-cut announcements tied to artificial intelligence keep rising. That trend matters for staffing, software, and training budgets, because companies deciding how much to spend on people versus tools shape future revenue and costs.
Analyst inference
What to watch
- Track whether employers keep citing artificial intelligence in US job-cut announcements, since that count has already more than doubled compared with all of 2025. Confirmed
- Watch for companies to disclose how much they spend on worker training versus artificial intelligence tools, which would clarify whether people or technology drive hiring decisions. Proposed
- Follow new hiring data and the Gallup survey for signs that managers, not artificial intelligence itself, determine who gets hired or laid off across industries. Analyst inference