News

Public · Published

Stablecoins vs Bank Deposits: Banca d'Italia Spots the GENIUS Act's Flaw

Banca d'Italia, Italy's central bank, found a key difference between Europe's MiCA rules and the US GENIUS Act. In Europe, stablecoins cannot pay interest or returns, but the US law leaves that possibility open, creating a regulatory gap.

Published:

Updated:

What happened

Banca d'Italia, Italy's central bank, found a key difference between Europe's MiCA rules and the US GENIUS Act. In Europe, stablecoins cannot pay interest or returns, but the US law leaves that possibility open, creating a regulatory gap.

Confirmed

Global impact / market context

If US stablecoins can pay returns, they may pull money away from bank deposits, pressuring banks' funding. This could push European regulators to tighten rules or adapt, affecting how stablecoin issuers and banks compete for everyday savers.

Analyst inference

Stablecoins are digital tokens meant to hold a steady value, often tied to a currency. The GENIUS Act is a US proposal to regulate them. This regulatory split could shift where investors park cash, influencing capital flows across regions.

Analyst inference

What to watch

  1. Watch whether the US GENIUS Act is finalized with the stablecoin yield provision intact, as Banca d'Italia has flagged this as the critical gap versus Europe's MiCA rules. Confirmed
  2. Monitor if European authorities respond by amending MiCA to allow stablecoin yields, which would close the gap and change competitive dynamics between stablecoins and bank deposits. Proposed
  3. Observe whether US stablecoin issuers start offering returns, which could draw deposits away from banks and force lenders to raise rates or offer new products to retain customers. Analyst inference

Affected assets

  • GENIUS — Genius

Evidence