News

Public · Published

Raja Venkatraman recommends three stocks for 27 October

Raja Venkatraman recommended three stocks for 27 October. He advised buying SAILIFE above Rs.1450, ACE above Rs.1020 and LT above Rs.3700, each with stated stop-loss and target levels. On 26 October 2026, the Nifty 50 rose 153.20 points to 22,753.20 and the Sensex gained 482.92 points to 73,606.75.

Published:

Updated:

What happened

Raja Venkatraman recommended three stocks for 27 October. He advised buying SAILIFE above Rs.1450, ACE above Rs.1020 and LT above Rs.3700, each with stated stop-loss and target levels. On 26 October 2026, the Nifty 50 rose 153.20 points to 22,753.20 and the Sensex gained 482.92 points to 73,606.75.

Confirmed

Global impact / market context

The buy levels, stop-losses and targets tell investors where the analyst expects gains and where losses would be capped. If these levels trigger, traders may commit cash to these stocks, shifting demand and positioning in construction equipment and engineering shares.

Analyst inference

The article describes highly uncertain market trends, with sharp swings leaving participants confused and confidence slow to recover. It notes elevated crude oil prices, geopolitical tensions and uncertainty around global central bank policies, while value buying and strength in metals and pharmaceuticals drove the rebound.

Analyst inference

What to watch

  1. The stated buy levels are Rs.1450 for SAILIFE, Rs.1020 for ACE and Rs.3700 for LT, with stop-losses at Rs.1380, Rs.978 and Rs.3575 and targets at Rs.1575, Rs.1135 and Rs.4010. Confirmed
  2. The analyst recommends buying each stock only above its stated level, which means a trader would wait for the price to rise past that point before acting, rather than buying at the current market price. Proposed
  3. If metals and pharmaceuticals keep rising and crude oil prices ease, confidence could recover and push these stocks toward their targets. A reversal instead could trigger the stop-losses, forcing traders to sell and lock in losses. Analyst inference

Evidence

  • Original source link unavailable