News

Public · Published

DQ: Q3 shipments surged and losses narrowed, but polysilicon remained below cost amid weak demand

Daqo New Energy's third-quarter shipments surged and losses narrowed from the prior quarter as volume growth lifted revenue. However, the average selling price stayed below production cost because demand was weak and inventories were high. Readily convertible assets, meaning cash and items easily turned into cash, reached $2.06 billion.

Published:

Updated:

What happened

Daqo New Energy's third-quarter shipments surged and losses narrowed from the prior quarter as volume growth lifted revenue. However, the average selling price stayed below production cost because demand was weak and inventories were high. Readily convertible assets, meaning cash and items easily turned into cash, reached $2.06 billion.

Confirmed

Global impact / market context

Selling polysilicon below production cost means each sale adds a loss, so higher shipment volumes lift revenue yet squeeze cash profit. The $2.06 billion in readily convertible assets gives Daqo a buffer to fund operations and capital spending while weak demand and high inventories persist.

Analyst inference

Weak near-term demand and high inventories keep polysilicon prices depressed, so Daqo's earnings depend on a price recovery more than on shipment growth. Its full-year production guidance of 175,000–185,000 metric tons signals continued output even with prices below cost, which can keep supply elevated.

Analyst inference

What to watch

  1. Full-year production guidance is 175,000–185,000 metric tons, so actual output versus that range will show whether Daqo keeps supplying a weak market and sustaining losses. Confirmed
  2. Watch whether the average selling price rises back above production cost; until it does, rising shipment volumes lift revenue but widen losses per unit sold. Analyst inference
  3. Track inventory levels and demand signals for signs of a price recovery; falling inventories would ease supply pressure, while persistently high stocks could delay any return above cost. Proposed

Evidence

  • Original source link unavailable