News

Public · Published

Yomiuri: Fujifilm Bets 10 Billion Yen on Magnetic Data Storage Resurgence

Fujifilm Corp. plans to raise magnetic tape production capacity by 400% compared with fiscal 2025, investing about 10 billion yen at its Odawara plant in Kanagawa Prefecture. The expansion, targeting fiscal 2028, focuses on 40-terabyte products that can store up to 100 terabytes of compressed data.

Published:

Updated:

What happened

Fujifilm Corp. plans to raise magnetic tape production capacity by 400% compared with fiscal 2025, investing about 10 billion yen at its Odawara plant in Kanagawa Prefecture. The expansion, targeting fiscal 2028, focuses on 40-terabyte products that can store up to 100 terabytes of compressed data.

Confirmed

Global impact / market context

This spending ties Fujifilm's sales growth to demand for cheap, low-power storage as AI generates more data. If tape orders rise, the new capacity could lift revenue and spread fixed costs; if demand disappoints, the added plant and staff would weigh on profit per sale and cash available.

Analyst inference

Tape is regaining use as offline backup for cold data, which is rarely accessed, because it costs less to store and uses less power than hard disk drives, though transfers are slow. Fujifilm's bet is that cyberattack concerns and AI-driven data growth keep pushing buyers toward tape.

Analyst inference

What to watch

  1. Fujifilm plans to upgrade production facilities and expand its workforce at the Odawara site to increase magnetic tape output, with the capacity increase measured against fiscal 2025 and targeted for fiscal 2028. Confirmed
  2. Watch whether Fujifilm discloses progress on the roughly 10 billion yen investment and the 400% capacity goal, since the article describes the plan based on sources rather than a formal company announcement. Proposed
  3. Track sales of the 40-terabyte tape products and demand from buyers storing cold data offline; slower uptake would leave Fujifilm with added capacity, staff costs, and weaker returns on the spending. Analyst inference

Evidence

  • Original source link unavailable